Eragon: Prologue

Doing a new thing!  Namely, in-depth reviews that take apart books chapter by chapter.  I guess technically it’s a deconstruction.  I’ve decided to start with Eragon by Christopher Paolini, which I read before in high school, but that was so long ago I’ve forgotten most of the book.  (Yeah, I’m super up-to-date on things.)

Eragon, Prologue: Shade of Fear

We’re not even a word in and already I’ve got problems with Paolini’s writing.  Prologues are so unnecessary, especially when they’re so incredibly short like this one.  (It’s a bit hard to tell how many pages it takes up, since I’m reading this on my Nook, but this section clearly isn’t very long.)  If you want to set up the story with a suspenseful scene, great – just make it the first chapter.  If it’s only a couple pages long, like in Eragon, merge it with the next chapter.

A tall Shade lifted his head and sniffed the air.  He looked human except for his crimson hair and maroon eyes.

These are only the second and third sentences in the book.  I told myself I was going to go easy on Paolini’s writing, because this is his first novel and he was pretty young when he wrote it, but I’m not even past the first paragraph and it’s already so bad.  “Looks human” is one of the least descriptive passages I have ever read, especially considering that this guy is a recurring antagonist.  Hair and eye color aren’t enough descriptors to give me a clear mental image.  Is he thin or fat, muscular or scrawny, pale or dark?  Does he have an angular face or chubby baby cheeks?  Does he have an awesome beard?  Is he wearing robes?  Leather armor?  Fishnets?  How long is his hair?  Does he have squinty eyes?  For fuck’s sake, Paolini describes the guy’s sword in more detail than this!  How hard is it to tell us what this guy looks like?

Around him shuffled twelve Urgals with short swords and round iron shields painted with black symbols.  They resembled men with bowed legs and thick, brutish arms made for crushing.  A pair of twisted horns grew above their small ears.

So… they’re orcs.  You know, there’s no shame in admitting that your writing is influenced by Tolkien.  He doesn’t have a monopoly on orcs any more than he does elves or dwarves – hell, the elves in this story are very clearly the Tolkien version that’s been used in fantasy literature for decades!  Just say they’re orcs instead of making them out to be some “original” fantasy race!

Again, we get the “they look like humans only different” description.  Amateur author or not, Paolini’s not being very creative here.  We’ve got a little more detail here, but it’s still so vague that my brain tries to fill things in and I end up picturing the Urgals as Ogremon from Digimon.

I take the Urgals about as seriously as I take Lovecraft, and I keep picturing all his monsters as Dr. Zoidberg.

Shades smells somebody coming and tells his minions to go and ambush them.  I don’t know why, because they’re horrible at sitting quietly and waiting and Shades has to scold them – I’m sorry, hiss at them – to get them to shut up.  After a bit the elves show up.  There’s two guards and a lady, and they at least get some decent description here:

On the first horse was an elf with pointed ears and elegantly slanted eyebrows.  His build was slim but strong, like a rapier.  A powerful bow was slung on his back.  A sword pressed against his side opposite a quiver of arrows fletched with swan feathers.

The last rider had the same fair face and angled features as the other.  He carried a long spear in his right hand and a white dagger at his belt.  A helm of extraordinary craftsmanship, wrought with amber and gold, rested on his head.

Between these two rode a raven-haired elven lady, who surveyed her surroundings with poise.  Framed by long black locks, her deep eyes shone with a driving force.  Her clothes were unadorned, yet her beauty was undiminished.  At her side was a sword, and on her back a long bow with a quiver.  She carried in her lap a pouch that she frequently looked at, as if to reassure herself that it was still there.

Better.  Still kind of vague, but we get a clearer picture of the elves than Shades and his buddies.  I’m also not sure how plain clothes would make a person look any less beautiful; nice clothing can certainly enhance beauty, but if you look good, wearing street clothes won’t change that.

Question: why are the words “Shade” and “Urgal” capitalized, but not “elf”?  They’re all species names, right?  So why aren’t elves special enough to earn a capital letter?  Is this supposed to be some sort of clue?  Are capital letters supposed to signify Bad Guys?  Or did Christopher Paolini just want to make his new fantasy races special?  I’d be more impressed by consistency in your narrative, Chris.

The guards switch places for … some reason, and they almost walk straight into the ambush when the wind changes, which freaks the horses out and alerts the elves to the presence of the Urgals.  Elf Lady bolts, but Shades shoots her horse out from under her with magical fire and she’s forced to flee on foot – but only after her guards are killed.  They don’t get off any shots or even get off their horses, they’re just shot down while she stares.  Tell me, what was the point of traveling with guards when they’re pretty much useless?  Was Elf Lady’s plan to have her Red Shirts distract the enemy while she escapes?  Because that only works if (a) they’re able to fight long enough for her to get away, and (b) she runs before they’re killed, not after.

Shades sends the Urgals after her, then climbs up an outcropping of rock and starts setting sections of the forest on fire in order to trap her.  Why would you do that?  He doesn’t seem to want to kill her, and it’s pretty clear he wants whatever she’s carrying, so why would he trap her with fire, which is notorious for quickly getting out of control?  One puff of wind in the wrong direction and everything he’s after goes up in smoke!  Not to mention it seems pretty extreme and more than a little desperate.  Shouldn’t the “trap them in a ring of fire” tactic be a last resort?

She skidded around and sped back to the trail.  Black Urgal blood dripped from her sword, staining the pouch in her hand.

I’m not sure how the physics of this works.  Either she’s holding the sword above the pouch with both hands in front of her, or she’s holding both the sword and the pouch in one hand.  The former makes for some very awkward running, as you generally use your arms for balance; the latter would make it very difficult to hold on to either object, let alone fight without dropping anything.

Shades finally manages to corner the elf, but orders his lackeys to capture her instead of doing it himself.  Which is a mistake, because Elf Lady pulls a blue stone out of the pouch and holds it up over her head in response.

A ball of red flame sprang from his hand and flew toward the elf, fast as an arrow.  But he was too late.  A flash of emerald light briefly illuminated the forest, and the stone vanished.  Then the red fire smote her and she collapsed.

The Shade howled in rage and stalked forward, flinging his sword at a tree.  It passed halfway through the trunk, where it stuck, quivering.  He shot nine bolts of energy from his palm – which killed the Urgals instantly – then ripped his sword free and strode to the elf.

What exactly was the point of killing all of his remaining minions?  Granted, they’re not particularly useful, but in this case it wasn’t their fault their quarry got away – unless they have even more powerful magic than Shades over there and just forgot to use it, there’s nothing they could have done to stop her.  And throwing his sword into a tree in the process makes Shades look less like a badass and more like a whiny toddler who’s just been told he has to go to bed.  This guy isn’t scary, he’s boring.

Disgust curled his lip before he turned back to the unconscious elf.  Her beauty, which would have entranced any mortal man, held no charm for him.  He confirmed the stone was gone, then retrieved his horse from its hiding place among the trees.  After tying the elf onto the saddle, he mounted the charger and made his way out of the woods.

He quenched the fires in his path but left the rest to burn.

Well, now we know he’s a bad guy – he’s letting the forest burn to the ground!

Also, didn’t the elves’ horses spook when they smelled him?  Shouldn’t his own horse be freaking out as well?  I guess it’s possible it could have been trained to accept him as a rider, but it seems to me that supernatural creatures capable of unnerving animals, even humanoid ones, would either be on their own supernatural mounts or not need mounts at all.

Whatever.  This prologue is bland and uninspired, and the rest of the book’s probably not going to be much better.


32 comments on “Eragon: Prologue

    • Why am I an idiot? Because I don’t like Eragon? Because I don’t like prologues? What is it you think I’m not comprehending? Don’t just throw insults at me; use examples! Explain your reasoning! And certainly don’t feel sorry for me, because I’m having fun with this.

      • I fail to understand why you hate this prologue, but I will attempt to put myself in your shoes for the moment. You hate the whole “humanoid” description because it fails to detail how the character should look. Understood. I personally believe Paolini only described what he believed to be important in order to put the characters in perspective. He only states two of Durza’s characteristics because they are all that set him apart from humans. Durza doesn’t care about appearance, so neither does Paolini. Durza is destructive and innately evil, so of course his sword is given major attention, as it is his implement of war. This entire story cycle is about war, so Paolini gives great description to the tools of war. Urgals are not innately the same as orcs, especially if you read into the last two books in the series. They are much stronger and innately braver than orcs, and have organized, structured societies. I am not ignorant regarding Tolkien’s universe-I have read and reread the initial four books, the Silmarillion, and various other pieces of Tolkien’s writings and the legendarium of Eä. Moving on to the guard situation: Durza was the most dangerous enemy who could have attacked the group, barring only Galbatorix. Arya was understandably dismayed by his appearance. Her guards were each shot at by approximately six archers apiece at close range with the element of surprise. Understandably, they died. On to the blazing forest. Regardless of whether he can control the fire (remember, he has no regard for anything but himself) Durza knows that Arya is quite capable herself. She is definitely able enough to avoid bursts of fire or heal herself if necessary. I personally would ask why she didn’t do the same as Durza and simply quench the flames in her path, but that’s not my point here. I don’t understand Paolini’s usage of the term “dripped” when the blood fell on the pouch, but some necessarily would have hit it if she was pumping her arms in good running form. He killed the remaining Urgals and threw his sword because…hmm…shall I quote the passage “It had taken many plots and much pain to bring himself to this moment.” He was frustrated. The Urgals were nothing but tools to him, so killing them was pretty much the same to him as throwing his sword into a tree. He killed them because his plans had been thwarted. Simple as that.

  1. It you need to have every aspect of a character’s face described in great detail, you shouldn’t be reading books. If an author describes to much, they lose their readers because it becomes boring and drawn out.

    • You know, that is the most original reasoning I’ve heard for why I shouldn’t read a book. Props to you, anon.
      I don’t have a comprehensive list of physical features that I must know about a character to enjoy reading, but knowing something about that character other than “he looked human except his hair and eyes were an odd color” would be nice. I don’t know if you’ve looked at a whole lot of human beings, but they tend to encompass a wide range of body types and ethnic groups, for starters. I don’t need or want a giant paragraph about what the character looks like down to the type of shoelaces they wear with their third-favorite outfit, but a general idea of what they look like would be good. I have a better mental picture of Bella Swan than I do of the Shade or even Eragon himself.

      • As you have so very helpfully pointed out, it’s a prologue. It’s there to give the audience a taste of the author’s writing and the plot to come. Have you re-read the whole book recently, or are you just reviewing it chapter by chapter? If he gave you a mental picture of one of the ‘recurring antagonists’ in the first few pages (which is focused on building tension and on the role the shade will take further into the book), then he would be repeating himself when it came time for Eragon’s encounter with Durza. And seriously, how old are you? Why are you painstakingly reviewing this when it is clear you have little to no interest in the genre and are not the audience it’s written for? If you don’t like it, don’t pull it apart for your own amusement. Descriptions of recurring characters should be built up. Like one of the previous commenters said, if you over do it, not only do you risk repeating yourself (tedious to read) or you bore your reader. “For me, good description usually consists of a few well-chosen details that stand for everything else. In most cases, these details will be the very first ones that come to mind.” (Stephen King). Some of the first things people use to describe others (particularly for identification) are skin, hair and eye colouring. Two out of three isn’t bad. And Twilight? Really? Below the belt much? Besides, humanoid is a good description for general shape. You should remember that they aren’t human, but if they have two arms, two legs and a similar face structure you’re either going to liken them to us or to monkeys. By not describing too much, it allows you (if you so choose) to picture it in a way unique to you. You become so much more involved with the story and that’s the point. By extending willing suspension of disbelief, you are actually reading fiction, not just sulking about someone not giving inspirational credit to other authors. Writing ‘BTW they looked like Orcs’ would kind of have spoilt it just a little, don’t you think?

    • Not to mention, a good author will find a way to incorporate the description into the narration, so it doesn’t come out as a huge info-dump that the reader then skips over.

      • Yeah. This one, although it’s really hard to do properly. I still haven’t managed to figure it out. Besides, its not like Paolini has any objection to infodumping about other things. Half a page of describing a sword, for instance.

  2. Pingback: Deconstruction Round Up, All Deconstructions | The Slacktiverse

  3. Pingback: Deconstruction Round Up, March 30th, 2013 | The Slacktiverse

  4. Pingback: Deconstruction Round Up, April 27th, 2013 | The Slacktiverse

  5. Pingback: Deconstruction Round Up, May 3rd, 2013 | The Slacktiverse

  6. Pingback: Deconstruction Round Up, May 10th 2013 | The Slacktiverse

  7. Pingback: Deconstruction Round Up, May 24th, 2013 | The Slacktiverse

  8. Pingback: Deconstruction Round Up, June 21, 2013 | The Slacktiverse

  9. Pingback: Deconstruction Round Up, August 10th, 2013 | The Slacktiverse

  10. Pingback: Deconstruction Round Up, September 1st | The Slacktiverse

  11. Pingback: Deconstruction Round Up, October 19th 2013 | The Slacktiverse

  12. Pingback: Deconstruction Round Up, December 14th, 2013 | The Slacktiverse

  13. Pingback: Deconstruction Round Up, February 8th, 2014 | The Slacktiverse

  14. Pingback: Deconstruction Round Up, February 15th, 2014 | The Slacktiverse

  15. Pingback: Deconstruction Round Up, March 1st, 2014 | The Slacktiverse

  16. Pingback: Deconstruction Round Up, March 7th, 2014 | The Slacktiverse

  17. Pingback: Deconstruction Roundup for April 18th, 2014 | The Slacktiverse

  18. Pingback: Deconstruction Roundup for April 25th, 2014 | The Slacktiverse

  19. Pingback: Deconstruction Roundup for June 20, 2014 | The Slacktiverse

  20. Pingback: Deconstruction Roundup for July 4, 2014 | The Slacktiverse

  21. Pingback: Deconstruction Roundup for October 10, 2014 | The Slacktiverse

  22. Pingback: Deconstruction Roundup for October 31, 2014 | The Slacktiverse

  23. Pingback: Deconstruction Roundup for November 7, 2014 | The Slacktiverse

  24. Pingback: Deconstruction Roundup for November 14, 2014 | The Slacktiverse

  25. Hey! I just started reading Eragon a week back and I was a bit prejudiced given that he wrote it when he was just 15. But I had to overlook those minor defects if I wanted to enjoy it. But I find it hard to read it for too long. There is not much in it that motivates me to get back to reading it, except for a few well writen lines and expressions, and I have not read it for three days straight. Nevertheless, I have to get back to it.
    I found your blog while idly browsing the net and I find it very amusing, even hilarious at times. I have to give it to you: you have really disected the story and reflected on every part possible. I share your frustration with the numerous incidents of Eragon’s fainting and I really am jealous of you. You read a text so thoroughly and bring out the minutest of details that I find myself an incapable reader😣. But that doesn’t diminish my appreciation for your blog.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s